 | |||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | |||||
1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
EDDIE PRYOR
()
Date: July 24, 2022 01:48PM
I have a 1964 turbo and need better exhaust manifolds and was told their different from the others because the ears are vertical and not horizontal like most corvairs.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
cnicol
()
Date: July 24, 2022 02:10PM
Only'60 models had vertically oriented outlet studs. Any '61-9, non-smog, 2-carb manifold will properly fit your '64 turbo.
Craig N. Coeur d'Alene ID.
66 Black Monza 4dr, 4.2L V8 49k
61 Seamist Jade Rampside 140 PG
65 Canadian Monza 4dr 110/PG 40k
66 Sprint Corsa convt - First car! Re-purchased 43 years later
2+2 gnatsuM 5691
+17 Tons of parts
Craig N. Coeur d'Alene ID.
66 Black Monza 4dr, 4.2L V8 49k
61 Seamist Jade Rampside 140 PG
65 Canadian Monza 4dr 110/PG 40k
66 Sprint Corsa convt - First car! Re-purchased 43 years later
2+2 gnatsuM 5691
+17 Tons of parts
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
RexJohnson
()
Date: July 24, 2022 03:11PM
I think a few '61's still used the vertical studs on the exhaust logs.
RJ tools
Salem,Oregon
RJ tools
Salem,Oregon
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
Timothy Shortle
()
Date: July 24, 2022 04:00PM
I think I agree with Rex. Now why do you think you need "better" exhaust manifolds?
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
Frank DuVal
()
Date: July 24, 2022 06:57PM
Maybe Eddie lives out here in the rusty east and the sealing surfaces are deteriorating or the ears are rusted away.
Seen this more than I wanted to.
Frank DuVal
Fredericksburg, VA
Seen this more than I wanted to.Frank DuVal
Fredericksburg, VA
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
corventure Dave
()
Date: July 24, 2022 07:34PM
I always had fun at the Fan Belt Toss swapmeet kidding the buyers saying, ALL my non 140 exhaust manifolds were "Turbo's"! Not! 
Corventure Dave
Corventure Dave
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
EDDIE PRYOR
()
Date: July 26, 2022 05:20PM
Thanks for the info. you guys are great
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
EDDIE PRYOR
()
Date: July 26, 2022 06:28PM
My Spyder is a third week of September 1963 build date.
from what I can tell the early 64s had no fan belt guards or the heat shield metal flap. i think these items were added to the engine mid year of 64.
can anyone out their give me any feedback on the accuracy of this.
from what I can tell the early 64s had no fan belt guards or the heat shield metal flap. i think these items were added to the engine mid year of 64.
can anyone out their give me any feedback on the accuracy of this.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
JimBrandberg
()
Date: July 26, 2022 06:35PM
I think the vertical studs worked okay on 60s because they didn't have the bulbous corner shrouds for the heater hoses. They will fit on 61 and later but are a little difficult. I see a lot of 61s with them, they must have had a big supply to work through.
Jim Brandberg
Isanti, MN
CorvairRepair.com
Jim Brandberg
Isanti, MN
CorvairRepair.com
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
EDDIE PRYOR
()
Date: July 26, 2022 07:06PM
Mine have bad rusty ears and someone welded on them and did a nasty job.A local friend has A good LH one that I need.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
junkman
()
Date: July 26, 2022 07:06PM
EDDIE PRYOR Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My Spyder is a third week of September 1963 build date.
> from what I can tell the early 64s had no fan belt guards or the heat shield metal flap. i think these items were added to the engine mid year of 64.
> can anyone out their give me any feedback on the accuracy of this.
My Corvair Spyder was the 3rd Spyder Coupe built, and the body is actually a 1963 body with 1964 trim. Without looking, from memory, the VIN is 0197? I will get a picture of the data plate and post it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Woodstock CT... Located on the Connecticut / Massachusetts border, approximately 6 miles from the center of Southbridge MA. About 45 minutes from Hartford CT. 1 1/2 hours West of Boston MA. Woodstock CT to Los Angeles CA 2,937.1 miles. 1 Mile as the crow flies to Big Bird's nest.
-------------------------------------------------------
> My Spyder is a third week of September 1963 build date.
> from what I can tell the early 64s had no fan belt guards or the heat shield metal flap. i think these items were added to the engine mid year of 64.
> can anyone out their give me any feedback on the accuracy of this.
My Corvair Spyder was the 3rd Spyder Coupe built, and the body is actually a 1963 body with 1964 trim. Without looking, from memory, the VIN is 0197? I will get a picture of the data plate and post it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Woodstock CT... Located on the Connecticut / Massachusetts border, approximately 6 miles from the center of Southbridge MA. About 45 minutes from Hartford CT. 1 1/2 hours West of Boston MA. Woodstock CT to Los Angeles CA 2,937.1 miles. 1 Mile as the crow flies to Big Bird's nest.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
Wagon Master
()
Date: July 26, 2022 07:41PM
You mean like they used a left over 63 body to build your 64?
I'd have to see that trim tag and v.i.n. plate.
I'd have to see that trim tag and v.i.n. plate.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
jbyenko77
()
Date: July 27, 2022 05:24AM
I have a 1964 spyder Los Angeles/ Van Nuys build early September build , bought new by my uncle, it has no belt guides, had no fresh air heat shield and came with 63 hubcaps and 63 steering wheel emblem
Engine number T0906YR
Jeff ballard
Camarillo ca
Engine number T0906YR
Jeff ballard
Camarillo ca
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
junkman
()
Date: July 28, 2022 02:23AM
Wagon Master Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You mean like they used a left over 63 body to build your 64?
> I'd have to see that trim tag and v.i.n. plate.
Bill Hubble started a discussion of this subject a couple of years ago looking for documentation on early 1964s. Possibly he can shed more light on using up the 1963 bodies for the early production of 1964s. The discussion centered around when the trunk compartment stopped having the cutouts for the gas heaters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Woodstock CT... Located on the Connecticut / Massachusetts border, approximately 6 miles from the center of Southbridge MA. About 45 minutes from Hartford CT. 1 1/2 hours West of Boston MA. Woodstock CT to Los Angeles CA 2,937.1 miles. 1 Mile as the crow flies to Big Bird's nest.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You mean like they used a left over 63 body to build your 64?
> I'd have to see that trim tag and v.i.n. plate.
Bill Hubble started a discussion of this subject a couple of years ago looking for documentation on early 1964s. Possibly he can shed more light on using up the 1963 bodies for the early production of 1964s. The discussion centered around when the trunk compartment stopped having the cutouts for the gas heaters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Woodstock CT... Located on the Connecticut / Massachusetts border, approximately 6 miles from the center of Southbridge MA. About 45 minutes from Hartford CT. 1 1/2 hours West of Boston MA. Woodstock CT to Los Angeles CA 2,937.1 miles. 1 Mile as the crow flies to Big Bird's nest.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
EDDIE PRYOR
()
Date: July 30, 2022 04:29AM
Thanks for all the great info.
Re: 1964 turbo exhaust manifold differences.
Posted by:
1966-Corsa-GT-180
()
Date: July 30, 2022 11:44AM
jbyenko77 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have a 1964 spyder Los Angeles/ Van Nuys build early September build , bought new by my uncle, it has no belt guides, had no fresh air heat shield and came with 63 hubcaps and 63 steering wheel emblem
> Engine number T0906YR
>
>
> Jeff ballard
> Camarillo ca
Jeff,
According to Dave Newell and other researchers,
1964 Corvairs were only built in Oshawa, Ontario, Canada and Willow Run, Michigan, USA.
1963 is the only "early model" built at Van Nuys (Los Angeles)
Check you VIN please.
Post a photo of your Fisher body ID plate, please.
Thank you
Dan Davis ~ Pierce County, WA ~ CCF admin ~
CORSA +Corvairs NW + North Cascades Corvairs + Corvanatics
1966 Corsa Turbo coupe ~ ~ 1966 Corsa 140 Coupe ~ ~ 1965 Monza 140/4 Convertible Sierra Tan/Fawn ~ 1964 Monza Spyder Convertible ~ 1960 Monza Ermine White/Red PG ++ ~ 1965 Monza 140/4 CoupeEvening Orchid w/ ivory/black interior ~ 1962 Monza Wagon 102/4 ~ 1963 Rampside/Scamper ~ 1963 Red/Greenbrier ~ 1969 Ultra Van #468
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have a 1964 spyder Los Angeles/ Van Nuys build early September build , bought new by my uncle, it has no belt guides, had no fresh air heat shield and came with 63 hubcaps and 63 steering wheel emblem
> Engine number T0906YR
>
>
> Jeff ballard
> Camarillo ca
Jeff,
According to Dave Newell and other researchers,
1964 Corvairs were only built in Oshawa, Ontario, Canada and Willow Run, Michigan, USA.
1963 is the only "early model" built at Van Nuys (Los Angeles)
Check you VIN please.
Post a photo of your Fisher body ID plate, please.
Thank you
Dan Davis ~ Pierce County, WA ~ CCF admin ~
CORSA +Corvairs NW + North Cascades Corvairs + Corvanatics
1966 Corsa Turbo coupe ~ ~ 1966 Corsa 140 Coupe ~ ~ 1965 Monza 140/4 Convertible Sierra Tan/Fawn ~ 1964 Monza Spyder Convertible ~ 1960 Monza Ermine White/Red PG ++ ~ 1965 Monza 140/4 CoupeEvening Orchid w/ ivory/black interior ~ 1962 Monza Wagon 102/4 ~ 1963 Rampside/Scamper ~ 1963 Red/Greenbrier ~ 1969 Ultra Van #468
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.